Securing the BGP or controlling it?
LarrySheldon at cox.net
Mon May 10 22:20:50 UTC 2010
On 5/10/2010 17:04, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Interestingly, the article misses interception and other non-outage
>> potentials due to (sub) prefix hijacking.
> you seem to be entering the world of attacks. the AP article's point
> was fat fingers.
Interesting. I took it as a set up of why we NEED a Central Authority.
*shrug* -- We'll see I guess, but probably not in time.
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
More information about the NANOG