NSP-SEC

Fri Mar 19 15:33:38 UTC 2010

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:08:55 CDT, Adam Stasiniewicz said:
> IMHO, I think you have it backwards.  I see strategic discussions (like
> new crypto algorithms, technologies, initiatives, etc) should be open to
> public debate, review, and scrutiny.  But operational/tactical discussions
> (like new malware, software exploits, virus infected hosts, botnets, etc)
> don't need public review.

Reducto ad absurdum: The police don't usually phone ahead to a suspect and say
"We're planning to stop by around 4PM and execute a search warrant, so please
don't destroy any evidence before then, ktxbai"

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20100319/a4c6003e/attachment.sig>