OBESEUS - A new type of DDOS protector

Guillaume FORTAINE gfortaine at live.com
Mon Mar 15 22:47:57 CDT 2010


Thank you for your reply.

1) First of all, I am absolutely not related to the Obeseus project. 
 From my point of view,  the interesting things were that :

a) This project was unknown.


b) This project comes from an ISP.


c) Its code is Open Source.


My conclusion is that I give far more credit to Obeseus than to Arbor 
Networks. By the way, I am surprised that this post didn't generate more 
interest given the uninteresting babble that I have been forced to read 
in the past on the NANOG mailing-list from the so-called "experts".

2) EDoS is a "DDoS 2.0"

DDoS is about malicious traffic.

EDoS is malicious traffic engineered to look like legitimate one.

However, the goal is the same : "to obliterate the service 
infrastructure", to quote Mister Morrow.

3) I do my homeworks something that doesn't seem to be the case for a 
lot of people on this mailing-list.

a) I would want to highlight the post of Tom Sands, Chief Network 
Engineer, Rackspace Hosting entitled "DDoS mitigation recommendations" [1].

-It seems evidence that he tried the Arbor solution so the three 
"Arbor++" mails don't make sense.

-About the fourth one :

"Sorry but RTFM


Best regards"

Hey kid, Tom Sands subscribed nearly a decade ago on the NANOG 
mailing-list. When you went out of school, he was already dealing with 
DoS concerns :


b) I am really asking myself how much credit I could give to a spam 
expert, Suresh Ramasubramanian, about a DDoS related post [2].

c) Mister Morrow, even if you are a Network Security engineer at Google 
[3] (morrowc at google.com) :

-You didn't provide any useful feedback on Obeseus.

-You totally missed the point on my other mails.

This is definitely disappointing.

Is this mailing-list a joke ?

Especially, where is Roland Dobbins ?

Best Regards,

Guillaume FORTAINE

[1] http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2010-January/016675.html
[2] http://www.hserus.net/
[3] http://www.linkedin.com/in/morrowc

On 03/16/2010 03:11 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> I got your point.  What I was saying is that what he calls EDoS (and
> I'm sure he'll say obliterating infrastructure is the ultimate form of
> an economic dos) is just what goes on ...
> You may or may not be able to overload the AWS infrastructure by too
> many queries but you sure as hell will blow the application out if
> that ddos isnt filtered .. edos again.
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Christopher Morrow
> <morrowc.lists at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> eh.. I guess I'm splitting hairs. the goal of 100k bots sending 1
>> query per second to a service that you know can only sustain 50k
>> queries/second is.. not to economically Dos someone, it's to
>> obliterate their service infrastructure.
>> Sure, you could ALSO target something hosted (for instance) at
>> Amazon-AWS and increase costs by making lots and lots and lots of
>> queries, but that wasn't the point of what Deepak wrote, nor what i
>> corrected.

More information about the NANOG mailing list