IP4 Space

Andy Davidson andy at nosignal.org
Fri Mar 5 12:22:17 UTC 2010


On 04/03/2010 19:30, William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja at bogus.com> wrote:
>> handling the v6 table is not currently hard (~2600 prefixes) while long
>> term the temptation to do TE is roughly that same in v6 as in v4, the
>> prospect of having a bunch of non-aggregatable direct assignments should
>> be much lower...
> Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today?

The opposite, but a clean slate means multihomed networks with many v4
prefixes may be able to be a multihomed network with just one v6 prefix.

Andy




More information about the NANOG mailing list