On the control of the Internet.
joelja at bogus.com
Mon Jun 14 01:21:07 UTC 2010
On 06/13/2010 06:13 PM, Bruce Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Joe Greco <jgreco at ns.sol.net> wrote:
>>> Generally speaking, it will be treated as damage and routed around.
>> That fable only really stands a chance when the damage is accidental; in
>> the case where such "damage" is being deliberately inflicted, particularly
>> by government, it gets more complicated. A lot of the 'net is a little
>> more centralized than it ought to be in order to allow the "routed around"
>> concept to work successfully.
>> ... JG
> BTW, I forget, when was the original ARPANET spec of surviving a
> nuclear war tested? I mean, we do know what would happen, right?
Paul baran's rand paper was on survivable networks. The arpanet was not
> Yes, Joe, the ARPANET fable does lives on.
> Bruce Williams
More information about the NANOG