ISP Responsibilities [WAS: Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers]

Larry Sheldon LarrySheldon at cox.net
Wed Jun 9 09:51:10 CDT 2010


On 6/9/2010 06:14, Owen DeLong wrote:
> 
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 11:14 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> To cut through the noise and non-relevant discussion, let's see if we can
>> boil this down to a couple of issues:
>>
>> 1. Should ISPs be responsible for abuse from within their customer base?
>>
> 	Yes, but, there should be an exemption from liability for ISPs that take
> 	action to resolve the situation within 24 hours of first awareness (by
> 	either internal detection or external report).

What happened to the acronyms "AUP" and "TOS"?

-- 
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.

Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
the vote.

Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca

ICBM Targeting Information:  http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml

	




More information about the NANOG mailing list