Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers
LarrySheldon at cox.net
Wed Jun 9 09:13:30 CDT 2010
On 6/9/2010 01:11, JC Dill wrote:
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>> Heck, at this point, I'd be OK with it being a regulatory issue.
> What entity do you see as having any possibility of effective regulatory
> control over the internet?
Doesn't matter as long as it enables radial outbound finger pointing.
> The reason we have these problems to begin with is because there is no
> way for people (or government regulators) in the US to control ISPs in
> eastern Europe etc.
Or in the US.
But what we see here is what is what is wrong with "regulation"--the
regulated specify the regulation, primarily to protect the economic
interests of the entrenched.
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
More information about the NANOG