Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers
fergdawgster at gmail.com
Wed Jun 9 06:18:31 UTC 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:11 PM, JC Dill <jcdill.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>> Heck, at this point, I'd be OK with it being a regulatory issue.
> What entity do you see as having any possibility of effective regulatory
> control over the internet?
> The reason we have these problems to begin with is because there is no
> way for people (or government regulators) in the US to control ISPs in
> eastern Europe etc.
Exactly, which is the problem we are foretelling.
If you guys can't wrap your brains around the problem, and can't come up
with suitable solutions to abate criminal activity, then the hammer drops
in a way which none of us will appreciate.
I think that is pretty clear.
The U.S. Government doesn't care about ISPs in The Netherlands or Christmas
Islands, because it is not within their jurisdiction.
But you are. That is the entire point.
- - ferg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
More information about the NANOG