I slogged through it so you don't have to -- ICANN Vertical Integration WG for dummies
Franck Martin
franck at genius.com
Mon Jul 26 23:11:54 UTC 2010
The question too, is which model is mitigating the best the presence of rogue registrars (like domain tasting registrars, etc..)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joly MacFie" <joly at punkcast.com>
To: "Eric Brunner-Williams" <brunner at nic-naa.net>
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 27 July, 2010 10:00:03 AM
Subject: Re: I slogged through it so you don't have to -- ICANN Vertical Integration WG for dummies
I found Milton Mueller's summary - noted at
http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=1006- useful.
Is there anything there that you would disagree with?
j
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams
<brunner at nic-naa.net> wrote:
> Actually the alliances visible at present are:
>
> JN2 proposal: Verisign, NeuStar, NetSol and eNom and others,
>
> RACK proposal: Afilas, PIR, GoDaddy, and others, including CORE.
>
> I look forward to your public comments, here or at the ICANN comment site.
>
> Eric
>
>
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
Secretary - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
---------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the NANOG
mailing list