IPv4 Exhaustion...

Michael Thomas mike at mtcc.com
Mon Jul 26 20:36:00 UTC 2010


On 07/26/2010 01:30 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:43:39 -0400, Lee Howard <lee at asgard.org> wrote:
>> RIAA should be IPv6 activists.
>
> Right. That's not going to bite them on the ass either... privacy
> addresses only stick around for ~72hrs. A demand for an address from 3
> months back would be impossible to answer. (that would require L2
> tracking that an ISP simply cannot do.)

Actually, what they'd probably really like is HIP (host identity payload).

Mike, I don't think it went anywhere though




More information about the NANOG mailing list