Using /126 for IPv6 router links

Mark Smith nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
Wed Jan 27 06:41:38 CST 2010


On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:08:36 +1030
Mark Smith <nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
wrote:

> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:09:11 -0800
> Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Jan 27, 2010, at 2:38 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > 
> > >> The general intent of the /48 allocation is that it is large enough for
> > >> nearly everybody, with nearly everybody including all but the largest
> > >> of organisations.
> > > 
> > > the general intent of a class B allocation is that it is large enough
> > > for nearly everybody, with nearly everybody including all but the
> > > largest of organisations.
> > > 
> > > hmmmmm
> > > 
> > > randy
> > 
> > That would, indeed, work if we weren't short of class B networks
> > to assign.
> > 
> 
> And we shrunk the Internet.
> 
> 

Should have been "Or"




More information about the NANOG mailing list