Using /126 for IPv6 router links
morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Tue Jan 26 17:16:06 UTC 2010
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Ron Bonica <rbonica at juniper.net> wrote:
> Discussion of draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p is on the IETF 6man WG
> mailing list. But please do chime in. Operator input very welcomed.
oh damned it! almost as many v6 ietf mailing lists as there are v6 addresses :(
subscribe info: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>
> Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Mathias Seiler
>> <mathias.seiler at mironet.ch> wrote:
>>> In reference to the discussion about /31 for router links, I d'like to know what is your experience with IPv6 in this regard.
>>> I use a /126 if possible but have also configured one /64 just for the link between two routers. This works great but when I think that I'm wasting 2^64 - 2 addresses here it feels plain wrong.
>>> So what do you think? Good? Bad? Ugly? /127 ? ;)
>> why not just ping your vendors to support this, and perhaps chime in
>> on v6ops about wanting to do something sane with ptp link addressing?
More information about the NANOG