Using /126 for IPv6 router links
trejrco at gmail.com
Tue Jan 26 13:35:35 UTC 2010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.lists at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 22:38
> To: Owen DeLong
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> >> Once you start planning a practical address plan, IPv6 isn't as big as
> >> everybody keeps saying...
> > It's more than big enough for any deployment I've seen so far with
> > of room to spare.
> Oh good! so the us-DoD's /10 request is getting filled when?
The US DoD has the equivalent of a /13 ... what is the question?
More information about the NANOG