Best Practices - BGP community to signal transit announces.
eksffa at freebsdbrasil.com.br
Sat Jan 23 17:51:23 UTC 2010
I am acting as transit for a number of ASNs, and my upstream peers do
filter my announces (as they should as I understand). Therefore I am in
the way to set up a community agreement with 'em asking 'em to allow my
transit announces for a certain community I wil signal 'em up.
Therefore, I have two doubts which I would like to share and hear out
Is there any best practices or RFC which shall suggest how this
community should be set up? Say, while I do standardize this community
to be MY-ASN:1 or MY-ASN:65501, is there a difference? Which community
numbers should be used for this purpose, if there are any best practice
Other than that, I remember Randi Bush's thread on signaling the
upstream provider with communities, where a "use with caution" warn was
issued. Therefore, is my scenario a "dont" in the "dos and donts"
list of practices on signaling the upstreams? If for some reason I
should avoid setting up a community for that, whats the other better way
to solve it, instead of asking for all upstream providers, one-by-one to
allow the transit prefix to be announced via me?
I have searched for their own existing communities and, while some up
peers do have an adequated community already in place for that, they
wont allow me to announce prefixes in their communities, and not
everyone will have a comm for that purpose.
More information about the NANOG