1/8 and 27/8 allocated to APNIC
nick at foobar.org
Fri Jan 22 08:03:56 CST 2010
On 22/01/2010 13:54, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Also, 27/8 is clearly in the middle of a group of North American military
> assignments. So at the very least, these aren't very CIDR'ish.
Is that operationally relevant to the /8 assignment process?
> Why not 36 & 37?
Random selection to ensure that no RIR can accuse IANA of bias. See
David's previous post:
More information about the NANOG