1/8 and 27/8 allocated to APNIC
William Allen Simpson
william.allen.simpson at gmail.com
Fri Jan 22 13:54:37 UTC 2010
Bill Stewart wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:13 PM, George Bonser <gbonser at seven.com> wrote:
>> Some of that water is dirtier than the rest. I wouldn't want to be the
>> person who gets 220.127.116.11/24
> I'd guess that 18.104.22.168 and 22.214.171.124 are probably much more widely used.
> At least 126.96.36.199/24 should be reserved by IANA or somebody.
I agree that 1/8 was probably about the *last* that should have been
allocated. It's particularly frustrating that they made two assignments
at the same time, but not to adjacent routing blocks....
Also, 27/8 is clearly in the middle of a group of North American military
assignments. So at the very least, these aren't very CIDR'ish.
Why not 36 & 37?
More information about the NANOG