dga at cs.cmu.edu
Tue Jan 19 22:02:04 CST 2010
You (the OP, not Jared) might also take a look at what the UTOPIA folks have been doing in Utah. It's been a state-funded, not federal-funded, project (I *believe* -- I may be incorrect in the details; I'm not involved and it's been a while since I looked at them), but they've met with some success.
On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Fletcher Kittredge wrote:
>> What do you want to know? We were the first NTIA grant announced. $32 million project to build rural *dark* fiber networks. The model was to form a new company which would be carrier neutral and just build and maintain rural dark fiber. A carrier's carrier; structural separation; prices based on cost plus margin, not what the market would bear, open access, non-discrimination.... This model seemed to resonate with the Feds. The local incumbents still seem to have a hard time believing we would get a government subsidy and then immediately give it away. A model where any carrier, including them, could have access to dark fiber on equal terms is beyond their ken.
> This is similar to what I have been doing research on. I wonder if the cellular coverage outside the I-95 corridor will get better as a result of your efforts...
> I really should have gotten fed up with my local [ineffective] incumbents with enough time to develop a similar approach.
> I do wonder if the upcoming FCC broadband work will result in a similar policy being adopted. "We're all just overlay networks of the fiber" is a nice approach.
> - Jared
More information about the NANOG