Anyone see a game changer here?
ge at linuxbox.org
Fri Jan 15 14:51:07 CST 2010
On 1/15/10 10:15 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Gadi Evron wrote:
>> 1. Unlike GhostNet, which showed an interesting attack but jumped to
>> conclusions without evidence that it was China behind them -- based on
>> Ethos alone I'd like to think that when Google says China did it, they
>> know. Although being a commercial company with their own agenda, I am
>> saving final judgement. Did Google ever say it's China rather than
>> from China?
> To my understanding they believe that people that live in China are
> relevant (which is why they brought it up in the context), but they are
> very carefully saying that they don't know the exact perpetrators.
Absolutely, they pointed it out to me elsewhere (I copy-pasted). I made
I mention them as #1 before the current incident out of respect. This
should have said "but many jumped to conclusions..." which is also what
I said at the time, and supports my third point.
Thanks for pointing this out.
ge at linuxbox.org.
More information about the NANOG