Anyone see a game changer here?
fred at cisco.com
Fri Jan 15 20:15:10 UTC 2010
On Jan 15, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Gadi Evron wrote:
> 1. Unlike GhostNet, which showed an interesting attack but jumped to
> conclusions without evidence that it was China behind them -- based
> on Ethos alone I'd like to think that when Google says China did it,
> they know. Although being a commercial company with their own
> agenda, I am saving final judgement. Did Google ever say it's China
> rather than from China?
To my understanding they believe that people that live in China are
relevant (which is why they brought it up in the context), but they
are very carefully saying that they don't know the exact perpetrators.
More information about the NANOG