SORBS on autopilot?
Michelle Sullivan
matthew at sorbs.net
Fri Jan 15 15:17:44 UTC 2010
telmnstr at 757.org wrote:
>> Did SORBS really cause you that much pain?
>
> Yes. We purchased colo space for some systems that didn't need high
> class of service (mostly development systems.) The IP space in a
> former lifetime was a dialup pool for analog modems.
>
> We of course changed the reverse DNS entries, and did the normal
> request with SORBS. Nothign really happened. I started looking into
> it, and finding stories of people doing the mandatory $90 donation to
> get express attention,
...and at this point we know the poster (like a fair few other in this
thread) is either talking c**p or mixing SORBS with some other list.
There is NO donation required for non spam listings (a DUHL entry is not
a spam listing) and $90 is plucked from thin air... a cursory look at
the SORBS website will attest to that.
Michelle
Note: The original poster was noted to have never opened a ticket @
SORBS by one of the staff.. I haven't verified that personally, but it
does follow a common theme.. People complain about listings and have
subsequently been found to have *not* requested delisting through the
correct channel (the SORBS support system)... I wonder how many would
get this sort of response (a firey NANOG thread) if they complained
their ADSL was broken to the yellowpages sales line...?!?!?
More information about the NANOG
mailing list