more news from Google
tme at americafree.tv
Wed Jan 13 10:38:28 CST 2010
On Jan 13, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2010, at 2:05 AM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
>> I for one would be really happy to see them follow through with
>> this. I was
>> very disappointed when they agreed to censor search results,
>> although I can
>> understand why they did so from a business standpoint... it seemed
>> to go
>> against the google mantra of "do no evil"...
>> I'm skeptical if they'll go through with it...
> According to their spokesperson, they have already stopped censoring.
> That sounds a bit iffy to me. It's one thing to say "we want to
> stop censoring, and will pull out if you don't let us", and "we are
> breaking the law, nah, nah, nah".
I assume that this is coupled with the message that they will pull out
I think it is the modern corporate equivalent of recalling your
> You don't like the law, don't do biz in that country. But blatantly
> breaking a law is bad joo-joo.
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ken Chase [mailto:math at sizone.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 12:24 AM
>>> To: nanog at nanog.org
>>> Subject: more news from Google
>>> I must say I'll have to take a step back from my previous
>>> having read this article.
>>> I just can't figure out their /ANGLE/. :) </cynic>
>>> Well played, google?
>>> Ken Chase - ken at heavycomputing.ca - +1 416 897 6284 - Toronto CANADA
>>> Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS
>>> @151 Front St. W.
More information about the NANOG