D/DoS mitigation hardware/software needed.
sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net
Mon Jan 11 18:12:55 UTC 2010
Precisely - I was saying that in order to add more point to your argument.
I wasn't disagreeing with you :)
Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIE-M/T
GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D
> -----Original Message-----
> From: christopher.morrow at gmail.com
> [mailto:christopher.morrow at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 12:49 PM
> To: Stefan Fouant
> Cc: jul; NANOG
> Subject: Re: D/DoS mitigation hardware/software needed.
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Stefan Fouant
> <sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net> wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.lists at gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:05 AM
> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:26 AM, jul <jul_bsd at yahoo.fr> wrote:
> >> > Martin Hannigan wrote on 05/01/10 16:50:
> >> >
> >> > Outsourced services have higher cost than Arbor but can handled
> >> Do they? VerizonBusiness's solution was $3250US/month so ~$90USk
> >> 2yrs. Arbor, I think, for a TMS + collectors was +100k.
> > Don't forget to factor in OpEx. This can often tilt the scales in
> favor of
> > one vs. the other.
> sure, but just capex alone the 'make vzb do this' option wins. (I
> think at least, I'm not a math guy though...)
More information about the NANOG