[Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
dot at dotat.at
Sun Feb 28 00:33:04 UTC 2010
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> On 02/27/2010 03:49 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Japanese government did two things:
> > - tax incentivise ipv6 compliance
> > - make meaningful ipv6 compliance mandatory when dealing with Japanese
> > government technical contracts.
> > The effect of this was to 1) create a direct financial incentive to deploy
> > meaningfully, and 2) create an indirect financial incentive to deploy ipv6
> > meaningfully. Spot the pattern here?
> If you are a network contractor for the US government or a vendor
> selling network equipment to the DOD then you've had a similar
> incentive, if it's not there, you're not going to end up on the approved
> suppliers list.
I get the impression that in Japan the incentives led to real deployment,
but not in the US - which is a big FAIL for DOD procurement policy.
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS.
MODERATE OR GOOD.
More information about the NANOG