Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee

Barry Shein bzs at world.std.com
Mon Feb 22 12:34:34 CST 2010


My initial reaction: Does the law in any way imply this mail address
has to be provided for free?

If not then I don't see any real problem on the surface. It just means
we have to offer the opportunity to keep the mail address functioning
for a fee.

That said, what does occur to me is what happens when we've closed
someone's account for email abuse (e.g., a spammer)?

That thought might be extended to non-payment, if an account is closed
for non-payment is there any further obligation under this law?

I assume sane heads will prevail in such cases but until then this
might conceivably create a loophole for some miscreant to harass the
provider. As a general rule miscreants often have no shame.

I suppose the whole forwarding / spamblocking issue arises but that's
not any different than any service which allows forwarding.

-- 
        -Barry Shein

The World              | bzs at TheWorld.com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD        | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
Software Tool & Die    | Public Access Internet     | SINCE 1989     *oo*




More information about the NANOG mailing list