"Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
cian.brennan at redbrick.dcu.ie
Sun Feb 21 14:09:26 UTC 2010
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 07:49:25PM -0800, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
> Right, because GCHQ doesn't/hasn't/never would do such a thing...
> At least the US has a written constitution and the concept of the people being sovereign.
> I'll take that over trusting "Her Majesty's..." whatever.
> But then again, I'm Irish, so I have a bit more direct personal and familial experience of the darker side of British "civilization". (EG: While detention without trial is relatively NEW in the US, it's been a fact of life in the UK for most of its history).
And in Ireland too.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: andrew.wallace [mailto:andrew.wallace at rocketmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 2:13 PM
> > To: Randy Bush
> > Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> > Subject: Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
> > --- On Sat, 20/2/10, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> > > From: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
> > > Subject: Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
> > > To: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace at rocketmail.com>
> > > Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> > > Date: Saturday, 20 February, 2010, 21:58
> > > > It looks like this demo is
> > >
> > > a bunch of sick press and sick ex-gov wishtheycouldbeagains
> > > trying to
> > > get as much mindshare as they can. and you're helping
> > > them.
> > >
> > > randy
> > >
> > I refuse to let you say I am helping them -- I am from UK, I don't
> > agree with them wanting to allow The NSA to take over private sector
> > networks or citizens smart phones 'in an emergency'.
> > Andrew
More information about the NANOG