"Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
Tomas L. Byrnes
tomb at byrneit.net
Sun Feb 21 03:49:25 UTC 2010
Right, because GCHQ doesn't/hasn't/never would do such a thing...
At least the US has a written constitution and the concept of the people being sovereign.
I'll take that over trusting "Her Majesty's..." whatever.
But then again, I'm Irish, so I have a bit more direct personal and familial experience of the darker side of British "civilization". (EG: While detention without trial is relatively NEW in the US, it's been a fact of life in the UK for most of its history).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: andrew.wallace [mailto:andrew.wallace at rocketmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 2:13 PM
> To: Randy Bush
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
> --- On Sat, 20/2/10, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> > From: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
> > Subject: Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
> > To: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace at rocketmail.com>
> > Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> > Date: Saturday, 20 February, 2010, 21:58
> > > It looks like this demo is
> > a bunch of sick press and sick ex-gov wishtheycouldbeagains
> > trying to
> > get as much mindshare as they can. and you're helping
> > them.
> > randy
> I refuse to let you say I am helping them -- I am from UK, I don't
> agree with them wanting to allow The NSA to take over private sector
> networks or citizens smart phones 'in an emergency'.
More information about the NANOG