LarrySheldon at cox.net
Sun Feb 14 11:54:25 CST 2010
On 2/14/2010 11:42 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Feb 14, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Jason Frisvold wrote:
>> On Feb 13, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> i am often on funky networks in funky places. e.g. the wireless in
>>> changi really sucked friday night. if i ssh tunneled, it would multiply
>>> the suckiness as tcp would have puked at the loss rate.
>> You can always run your own local resolver... Or is there a reason that's unacceptable?
> How does that help? It still sends port 53 requests to the authorities, which will be intercepted.
I don't have access to a trustable network to tunnel to. (Or at least I
don't know how to.)
I wish some enteprenure would start a subscription service to provide
honest DNS (and maybe authenticatrd outbound email) that I could point
to regardless of to where I may have wandered.
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to
take everything you have."
Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
More information about the NANOG