CYMRU Bogon Peering

Nathan Ward nanog at daork.net
Fri Feb 12 19:09:40 CST 2010


On 13/02/2010, at 2:03 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:

> On 2/12/2010 15:03, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> 
>> What time frame do you determine to be instability? The following is
>> from a box that has ~25 neighbours. Since the box was reloaded (6w3d
>> ago), I've had the same uptime with the Team Cymru neighbours as I do
>> with internal gear. I can't say that I've experienced any instability at
>> all. It is not uncommon for me to have noticed uptimes well beyond 30w.
>> 
> 
> 
> Mine are not so good:
> 
> Neighbor        V    AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down
> State/PfxRcd
> 38.229.0.5      4 65333  115856  115859 16411814    0    0 01:33:51       30
> 
> 68.22.187.24    4        65333   26968   29671 16311293    0    0 2w4d
>         30
> 
> I see you have 68.22.187.24 in your list too, but my uptime is less. Are
> you using increased hold times?

Nevermind BGP timers, do you normally do well holding TCP connections open for weeks on end across the Internet?

--
Nathan Ward



More information about the NANOG mailing list