CYMRU Bogon Peering
nanog at daork.net
Sat Feb 13 01:09:40 UTC 2010
On 13/02/2010, at 2:03 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 2/12/2010 15:03, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> What time frame do you determine to be instability? The following is
>> from a box that has ~25 neighbours. Since the box was reloaded (6w3d
>> ago), I've had the same uptime with the Team Cymru neighbours as I do
>> with internal gear. I can't say that I've experienced any instability at
>> all. It is not uncommon for me to have noticed uptimes well beyond 30w.
> Mine are not so good:
> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down
> 22.214.171.124 4 65333 115856 115859 16411814 0 0 01:33:51 30
> 126.96.36.199 4 65333 26968 29671 16311293 0 0 2w4d
> I see you have 188.8.131.52 in your list too, but my uptime is less. Are
> you using increased hold times?
Nevermind BGP timers, do you normally do well holding TCP connections open for weeks on end across the Internet?
More information about the NANOG