Regular Expression for IPv6 addresses

Jeroen Massar jeroen at unfix.org
Thu Feb 4 19:16:53 CST 2010


Mark Andrews wrote:
[..]
> And now for the trick question.  Is ::ffff:077.077.077.077 a legal
> mapped address and if it, does it match 077.077.077.077?

::ffff:0:0:0:0/96 should never ever be shown to a user, as it is
confusing (is it IPv6 or IPv4?) and does not make sense at all.
As such whatever one thinks of it, it is "illegal" in that context.

Internally inside a program though using a 128bit sequence of memory is
of course a great way to store both IPv6 and IPv4 addresses in one
structure and that is where the ::ffff:0:0:0:0::/96 format is very
useful and intended for. Of course still the representation to the user
of addresses stored that way would be 77.77.77.77 (and thus an IPv4
address and not IPv6) even though internally it is written as an IPv6
address.

As that usage is internal, you don't need any validation of the format
as the input will be either an IPv6 or IPv4 address without any of the
compatibility stuff, thus one does not need to handle it anyway.

Of course, there should be only limited places where a user can enter or
see IP addresses in the first place. There is this great thing called
DNS which is what most people should be using.

Greets,
 Jeroen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20100204/493ab21d/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list