How polluted is 1/8?

Nathan Ward nanog at daork.net
Wed Feb 3 16:47:53 CST 2010


On 4/02/2010, at 9:19 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:

> I would hope that the APNIC would opt not to assign networks that would contain 1.1.1.1 or 1.2.3.4 to customers for exactly that reason.  The signal-to-noise ratio for those addresses is likely pretty high.  The noise is likely contained on many internal networks for now because a corresponding route doesn't show up in the global routing table at the moment.  Once that changes....

1.1.1/24 and 1.2.3/24 are assigned to APNIC. Unless they release them, the general public will not get addresses in these.

--
Nathan Ward



More information about the NANOG mailing list