How polluted is 1/8?
nanog at daork.net
Wed Feb 3 16:47:53 CST 2010
On 4/02/2010, at 9:19 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> I would hope that the APNIC would opt not to assign networks that would contain 184.108.40.206 or 220.127.116.11 to customers for exactly that reason. The signal-to-noise ratio for those addresses is likely pretty high. The noise is likely contained on many internal networks for now because a corresponding route doesn't show up in the global routing table at the moment. Once that changes....
1.1.1/24 and 1.2.3/24 are assigned to APNIC. Unless they release them, the general public will not get addresses in these.
More information about the NANOG