IPv6 BGP table size comparisons

Scott Morris swm at emanon.com
Tue Dec 21 19:01:26 UTC 2010


   Size doesn't matter.  It's how well you use it.
   Route it, baby...
   ;)

   On 12/21/10 1:56 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:

On 12/21/2010 11:32, Frank Bulk wrote:

A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that had made
a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different operators (i.e. HE,
Cogent, Sprint, etc), making the point that a full view might take multiple
feeds.  I think that website also had text files with the comparisons.

Whip yours out and lets have an on list comparison of table sizes

:-D



More information about the NANOG mailing list