IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
Scott Morris
swm at emanon.com
Tue Dec 21 19:01:26 UTC 2010
Size doesn't matter. It's how well you use it.
Route it, baby...
;)
On 12/21/10 1:56 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
On 12/21/2010 11:32, Frank Bulk wrote:
A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that had made
a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different operators (i.e. HE,
Cogent, Sprint, etc), making the point that a full view might take multiple
feeds. I think that website also had text files with the comparisons.
Whip yours out and lets have an on list comparison of table sizes
:-D
More information about the NANOG
mailing list