"potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the Comcast - L3 dispute

Steve Schultze sjs at Princeton.EDU
Sat Dec 18 05:38:19 UTC 2010


http://blog.comcast.com/2010/12/comcasts-responds-to-level-3s-fcc-filing.html

On Dec 17, 2010, at 10:25 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> http://fcc.gov/
> 
> NOTICE: The FCC website and related electronic filing systems and documents (except for NORS) will be unavailable beginning 6:00 p.m. (EST) Friday, December 17 through 6:00 a.m. (EST) Monday, December 20 for scheduled maintenance.
> 
> 
> :(
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Steve Schultze <sjs at princeton.edu> wrote:
> 
> > That is a reasonable guess, but Level3's FCC filing yesterday spells
> > out with certainty that Level3 did offer to "cold potato" traffic onto
> > Comcast (it does not mention the technical means e.g. MED honoring,
> > CDN smarts, or otherwise) and that Comcast refused.
> > [...]
> 
> Comcast's latest:
> http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6016064677
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
> WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
>  http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
>   VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
> ---------------------------------------------------------------




More information about the NANOG mailing list