Pointer for documentation on actually delivering IPv6

Joel Jaeggli joelja at bogus.com
Tue Dec 7 14:23:07 UTC 2010


On 12/7/10 5:18 AM, david raistrick wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Owen DeLong wrote:
> 
>> Seriously, though, you're welcome to use fd00::/8 for exactly that
>> purpose. The problem is that you (and hopefully it stays this way)
>> won't have much luck finding a vendor that will provide the NAT for
>> you to do it with.
> 
> [with my flame-retardant hat installed firmly]
> 
> So what's the IPV6 solution for PCI compliance, where 1.3.8 requires the
> use of RFC1918 space?  Admitedly, it's been a year or two since I last
> had to engineer around that particular set of rules...but it's life or
> death for a lot of folks.

Document a compensating control...

That particular case is trivial to demonstrate that the in scope
addresses are not exposed to the internet.

> 
> 
> -- 
> david raistrick        http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> drais at icantclick.org             http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
> 
> 





More information about the NANOG mailing list