The scale of streaming video on the Internet.

Michael Painter tvhawaii at shaka.com
Fri Dec 3 22:11:27 UTC 2010


mikea wrote:
> Faster and doesn't require infrastructure (other than possibly electrical
> power). Those hams were throttled _way_ back, too, to about 21 words per
> minute; I frequently hear Morse at speeds up to about 50 wpm in the ham
> bands.

In '56 ( I was 13 yrs old...got my General at 11), I handled traffic on PAN (Pacific Area Net) at around 30 wpm with a bug 
and a stick, stick being a pencil.
Bug here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHz2rEiFnfw&feature=related

--Michael (ex K6IYC) 





More information about the NANOG mailing list