Lightly used IP addresses
jcurran at arin.net
Mon Aug 16 07:13:15 CDT 2010
On Aug 16, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Just me (we don't pay Steve to read Nanog, although I do
forward him legalistic emails depending on content :-)
> Bill makes a reasonable point here. Is there a way to, in the next round of
> LRSA mods, include something to the effect of:
> Under the ARIN Policy Development Process, the board will not ratify any
> policy which exclusively affects LRSA signatories in a manner inconsistent
> with its effect on other resource holders.
> That's probably not ideal wording, but, I hope it conveys the general idea
> and I hope smarter people can find better language. It does seem to me
> to be a reasonable request and consistent with the intent of the LRSA.
> If you prefer that I submit this via ACSP I will do so. However, it seems to
> me it could fall within the same scope as the other clarification John offered
I'll run with it, but would ask you send in to the suggestion process
so that it doesn't get lost given our level of activity nowadays.
President and CEO
More information about the NANOG