Lightly used IP addresses

John Curran jcurran at arin.net
Mon Aug 16 07:13:15 CDT 2010


On Aug 16, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> 
> John/Steve,

Just me (we don't pay Steve to read Nanog, although I do 
forward him legalistic emails depending on content :-)

> Bill makes a reasonable point here. Is there a way to, in the next round of
> LRSA mods, include something to the effect of:
> 
> Under the ARIN Policy Development Process, the board will not ratify any
> policy which exclusively affects LRSA signatories in a manner inconsistent
> with its effect on other resource holders.
> 
> ===
> 
> That's probably not ideal wording, but, I hope it conveys the general idea
> and I hope smarter people can find better language. It does seem to me
> to be a reasonable request and consistent with the intent of the LRSA.
> 
> If you prefer that I submit this via ACSP I will do so. However, it seems to
> me it could fall within the same scope as the other clarification John offered
> earlier.

I'll run with it, but would ask you send in to the suggestion process
so that it doesn't get lost given our level of activity nowadays.

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN








More information about the NANOG mailing list