Numbering nameservers and resolvers
ariev at vayner.net
Mon Aug 16 08:08:31 UTC 2010
For resolvers, I guess it would make sense to advertise them as /32s as
dynamic prefixes coming from some SLB device...
You can have multiple VIPs, each representing a different POP/network
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Mike <mike-nanog at tiedyenetworks.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> I am needing to renumber some core infrastructure - namely, my
> nameservers and my resolvers - and I was wondering if the collective wisdom
> still says heck yes keep this stuff all on seperate subnets away from
> eachother? Anyone got advice either way? Should I try to give sequential
> numbers to my resolvers for the benefit of consultants ... like .11, .22 and
> .33 for my server ips?
More information about the NANOG