Appliance Vs Software based routers
Greg.Whynott at oicr.on.ca
Wed Aug 4 15:44:19 UTC 2010
GNS is just a front end for dynamips/qemu. ASA will run under qemu without the use of extra wrappers/tools. it will run natively under vmware too. ASA is basically an application running above a linux kernel. I forget what the internal name is, lisa or similar…
On Aug 4, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Mike Walter wrote:
> I assume the ASA's don't run natively on VMware or Xen, I assume you have to use something like GNS3. I think that would be fine for testing, but in real world production running an ASA on GNS3 under an another OS seems like a bad idea. I hope Cisco will come out with Virtual Appliances for some of their products like they did for the Nexus 1000V.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daryl G. Jurbala [mailto:daryl at introspect.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:54 AM
> To: Xavier Beaudouin
> Cc: nanog
> Subject: Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers
> On Aug 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
>> Le 4 août 2010 à 15:14, Mirko Maffioli a écrit :
>>> 2010/7/25 Laurens Vets <laurens at daemon.be>:
>>>> Cisco PIX: no, Cisco ASA: yes. It even runs under VMware... It's however
>>>> very hackish... :)
>>> Cisco ASA under VMware?? :|
>> CiscoASA is based on x86, there is no reasons you cannot run this into VMWare or Xen...
> If that were the only qualification, PIX builds for the 515s would run under VMWare or XEN as well. Maybe they do, but I've never seen it.
More information about the NANOG