[only half OT] A socio-psychological analysis of the firstinternet war (Estonia)
Michael Smith
msmith at internap.com
Fri Apr 30 13:15:16 UTC 2010
What is/isn't a "war"? Was US/Vietnam a war? It wasn't declared legally... do you take issue with using the word war due to the nature of the event, or is it simply a question of scale?
From what I've read so far of this paper, the incident being called "a war" isn't central to the thesis. Search / replace "war" with "incident" and the discussion works fine. Your issue with the choice of words might be significant on some level, but you haven't refuted any of the conclusions.
-----Original Message-----
From: andrew.wallace [mailto:andrew.wallace at rocketmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:26 PM
To: nanog at nanog.org; ge at linuxbox.org
Subject: Re: [only half OT] A socio-psychological analysis of the firstinternet war (Estonia)
--- On Thu, 29/4/10, Gadi Evron <ge at linuxbox.org> wrote:
> A socio-psychological analysis of the first internet war (Estonia)
There has been no cyber war yet.
Estonia was not a cyber war.
You've got it fundamentally wrong on the world stage infront of everyone.
Andrew
More information about the NANOG
mailing list