the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
drc at virtualized.org
Wed Apr 28 17:31:32 CDT 2010
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:07 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to renumber?
> We have that ability already. Doesn't require NAT.
Cool! You've figured out, e.g., how to renumber authoritative name servers that you don't have direct control over! And modify filter lists on a firewalls across an enterprise network! And remotely update provisioning systems and license managers without interrupting services! Etc., etc.
A tiny home office network managed by a highly technical individual with full control over all aspects of the network is not a good model on which to base the definition of "we".
More information about the NANOG