the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

Nick Hilliard nick at foobar.org
Tue Apr 27 18:02:00 UTC 2010


On 27/04/2010 18:48, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> Anyone inventing a new service/protocol that doesn't work with NAT isn't
> planning on success.

You mean, like multisession bgp over tls?

Nick,
just sayin'




More information about the NANOG mailing list