Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
joelja at bogus.com
Sat Apr 24 14:07:00 CDT 2010
On 04/22/2010 08:25 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:04 AM, John Lightfoot wrote:
>> That's Hedley.
> I believe that he is talking about Hedy Lamarr, the co-inventor of
> frequency hopping spread spectrum.
The patent which bears her and George Antheil's name is by no means (and
about 30 years) the earliest example of this technology.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
>> [mailto:bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:34 AM
>> To: Simon Perreault
>> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:34:20AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
>>> On 2010-04-22 07:18, William Herrin wrote:
>>>> On the other hand, I could swear I've seen a draft where the PC picks
>>>> up random unused addresses in the lower 64 for each new outbound
>>>> connection for anonymity purposes.
>>> That's probably RFC 4941. It's available in pretty much all operating
>>> systems. I don't think there's any IPR issue to be afraid of.
>> not RFC4941... think abt applying Heddy Lamars
>> patents on spread-spectrum to source address selection.
More information about the NANOG