Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

Dave Sparro dsparro at gmail.com
Wed Apr 21 12:53:26 CDT 2010

On 4/21/2010 8:46 AM, Jim Burwell wrote:
> Despite it doing the job it was intended to do, I've always seen NAT
> as a bit of an ugly hack, with potential to get even uglier with LSN
> and multi-level NAT in the future.  I personally welcome a return to a
> NAT-less world with IPv6.  :)

Don't you get all of the same problems when there is a properly 
restrictive SPI firewall at both ends of the connection regardless of 
weather NAT is used as well.

More information about the NANOG mailing list