[Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01]

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Wed Apr 21 00:29:07 CDT 2010

While I think this is an improvement, unless the distribution of ULA-C is no cheaper
and no easier to get than GUA, I still think there is reason to believe that it is likely
ULA-C will become de facto GUA over the long term.

As such, I still think the current draft is a bad idea absent appropriate protections in
RIR policy.


On Apr 20, 2010, at 9:34 PM, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

> and a very pleasant evening.
> a few questions.
> IPv6 on your radar?
> Looking at options for addressing your future v6 needs?
> Have you looked at the IETF/ID in the subject line?
> if you think something like this is a good idea, worth 
> persuing, I'd like to hear from you.
> --bill

More information about the NANOG mailing list