Juniper firewalls - SSG or SRX
nanog at maunier.org
Tue Apr 20 02:54:00 CDT 2010
I prefer Junos as screenOS except for one thing :
HA is a hell to configure with Junos whereas it's really easy to do it with
screenOS, at least last time I tried a couple of months ago.
Anyway, ScreenOS cli really sucks compared to JunOS cli.
2010/4/20 seph <seph at directionless.org>
> I'm with Owen. I have nothing good to say about ScreenOS. In contrast
> JunOS has been great.
> Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> writes:
> > Much.. Go SRX over SSG every time. For anything that doesn't have an
> > SRX analog, consider the J-series.
> > SRX/J-Series == JunOS == Good.
> > SSG Series == ScreenOS == @)#$*#@)$(*!)(@[email protected]$
> > Just my $0.02 having dealt extensively with both environments over the
> > years.
> > Owen
> > On Apr 19, 2010, at 5:32 PM, Jeffrey Negro wrote:
> >> Has anyone on Nanog had any hands on experience with the lower end of
> >> new SRX series Junipers? We're looking to purchase two new firewalls,
> >> I'm debating going with SSG series or to make the jump to the SRX line.
> >> input, especially about the learning curve jumping from ScreenOS to
> >> would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.
> >> Jeffrey
More information about the NANOG