Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

Nick Hilliard nick at foobar.org
Mon Apr 19 09:39:16 CDT 2010

On 19/04/2010 16:14, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
> The eyeball ISPs will find it trivial to NAT should they ever need to do
> so [...]


Having made this bold claim, have you ever actually tried to run a natted
eyeball network?  The last two natted eyeball networks I worked with could
never figure out which aspect of NAT hurt more: the technical side or the
business side.


More information about the NANOG mailing list