legacy /8

bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Fri Apr 2 19:32:28 CDT 2010

On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 09:25:08AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> > IPv6 as effectively reindroduced classful addressing.
> but it's not gonna be a problem this time, right?  after all,
> 32^h^h128^h^h^h64 bits is more than we will ever need, right?
> randy

	well... looking at a diet analogy, when .gt. 50% of your
	diet is HFCS and filler, its not real healthy.  the way
	most folks are using IPv6, .gt. 50% of the bits are wasted
	as filler (got to love me some ::)

	so it seems like a lot, yet folks have already predicted the
	demise of IPv6 in the next 20years. (Klensin I think it was)


More information about the NANOG mailing list