IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
nanog at daork.net
Sun Oct 18 09:02:47 UTC 2009
On 18/10/2009, at 9:52 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 09:29:41PM +1300, Nathan Ward wrote:
>> Perhaps, but if you're operating a LAN segment you're going to want
>> filter rouge RA and DHCPv6 messages from your network, just like
>> you do
>> with DHCP in IPv4.
>> Filtering RA and DHCPv6 are done in very similar ways.
> Unfortunately, no. Many/most LAN switches don't support filtering
> IPv6 traffic yet. Of those that do, most only support TCP/UDP ports
> but not ICMPv6 types or RA specifically. Therefore, right now it is
> probably easier to find support to filter DHCPv6 (udp source port 547)
> than it is to find support to filter RA. This is a real problem even
> for people who are not using IPv6 right now and have no desire to use
> IPv6 yet, because Rogue RAs will redirect all IPv6 traffic to a rogue
> box on the LAN, breaking access to dual-stack servers on the Internet.
> The impact is worse when you start trying to roll out IPv6 dual-stack
> to selected servers on your own LAN.
This is true for now until we get switches with code to do this, and
also doesn't change my point.
More information about the NANOG