ISP customer assignments
davet1 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 05:51:24 UTC 2009
Nathan Ward wrote:
> On 16/10/2009, at 1:17 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Is there any good solution to this? I don't expect us to fill the /32
>> to justify expanding it (although I do see ARIN appears to have left
>> space for up to a /29; I guess that's their sparse allocation policy?).
> Your justification is that you have two sites without a guaranteed
> link between them.
> This is a bit annoying though, yeah. But, I'm not sure I can think of
> a good solution that doesn't involve us changing the routing system so
> that we can handle a huge amount of intentional de-aggregates or
> Nathan Ward
Actually, as of right now that's not justification. The Multiple
Discrete Networks policy that's up for a vote in Dearborn will allow for
this, but right now there's no IPv6 equivalent of that policy.
More information about the NANOG