109/8 - not a BOGON
mpalmer at hezmatt.org
Sat Oct 10 10:31:59 UTC 2009
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:22:01PM +0100, Matthew Walster wrote:
> A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of addresses
> he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This was
> declassified as a BOGON and assigned by IANA to RIPE in January 2009.
> If you have a manually updated BOGON list, can I please ask that you review
> it and update it as soon as possible please? His addresses in 89/8 and 83/8
> work just fine, hence this presumption of BOGON filtering.
A pingable address in the problem range would help people to quickly
evaluate whether they have a problem in their network or upstreams...
More information about the NANOG