109/8 - not a BOGON

Matthew Walster matthew at walster.org
Fri Oct 9 11:22:01 UTC 2009

Hi there,

A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of addresses
he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This was
declassified as a BOGON and assigned by IANA to RIPE in January 2009.

If you have a manually updated BOGON list, can I please ask that you review
it and update it as soon as possible please? His addresses in 89/8 and 83/8
work just fine, hence this presumption of BOGON filtering.

Matthew Walster

More information about the NANOG mailing list